Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mabelle Prior

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 03:33, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mabelle Prior

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously declined twice by different editors at AfC before being moved to mainspace with little improvement. Non-notable individual who doesn't meet WP:ANYBIO or WP:GNG. Additionally the content is written in a promotional tone not indicative of encyclopedic content. TonyBallioni (talk) 22:31, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I've formatted and checked the references - notable person - written by someone with poor English but not promotional - needs cleanup Mark^Dask 03:16, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - notable person - FFA P-16 (talk) 16:22, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 03:32, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:34, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ghana-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:34, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:34, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Still for Keep.FFA P-16 (talk) 13:19, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As you should know by now, as a fairly frequent editor at Afd, only one bolded !vote per editor, please. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:27, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:27, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 19:02, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 20:40, 15 March 2017 (UTC) [reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:46, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Promotional tone, yes, but that is a content issue, not a notability one. The sources linked in the article (e.g., The Graphic and SpyAfrica) indicate she passes WP:GNG. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 17:48, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.