Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mahasarakham Rajabhat University Stadium

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 20:57, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mahasarakham Rajabhat University Stadium

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet the WP:General notability guideline. Paul_012 (talk) 10:56, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 11:42, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Paul_012 (talk) 12:09, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no evidence of notability. Giant Snowman 13:36, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:GEOFEAT. No indication the stadium has received significant third-party coverage. Fenix down (talk) 14:06, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:34, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:34, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Hhkohh (talk) 13:11, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Delete votes are lazy WP:JNN arguments. The article clearly is lacking sources, but that does not make an article non-notable. Quidster4040 (talk) 13:44, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- User:Quidster4040, I manually went through pages of search results WP:BEFORE nominating the article for AfD. I did not find any in-depth coverage by a third party reliable source. You're citing WP:JNN, but don't appear to be making any argument that demonstrates the subject's notability either. --Paul_012 (talk) 14:22, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.