Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Max Kreijn

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 21:21, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Max Kreijn

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability in accordance with WP:ARTIST is not established. In accordance with WP:BEFORE, the article has been tagged for re-write as well as a stub for over two years. This article is a one line statement with no sources or any potential claims that might meet the notability requirements. There is no evidence that this article will ever become more that a stub of no encyclopaedic value. Ash (talk) 16:48, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:08, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. -- Cybercobra (talk) 01:41, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- Cybercobra (talk) 01:42, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no assertion of notability. Johnbod (talk) 01:48, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. As the nominator has stated, the guidelines at WP:ARTIST have not been met. And as far as I can see, there's nothing to go on to even make this a borderline case. His name appears in innumerable Google searches, half of which appear to be "No mention of him here" and the other half are just his name on websites selling his paintings. Nothing here sets him or any of his work apart in any way. Un school 03:50, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not enough, as the article stands. If references, and/or notability is established beyond an assertion, I will change to keep...Modernist (talk) 03:59, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per Johnbod's comment Netalarmtalk 04:15, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not notable, not sourced and not "sourceable". McMarcoP (talk) 09:33, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.