Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Metaprism

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 23:00, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Metaprism

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I searched for coverage of this band in RS and did not find significant coverage to meet WP:NORG. There are a few hits on Google News but none of them meet WP:SIGCOV. I did find this album review but I don't think it meets WP:RS and if it did, it is only one source while multiple are required. (t · c) buidhe 22:43, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. (t · c) buidhe 22:43, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:56, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I found a couple of sources and added, but it's not enough. Chelokabob (talk) 08:51, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Only two RS here...doesn't pass GNG. Deathlibrarian (talk) 08:04, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Insufficient sources to demonstrate notability. Such-change47 (talk) 06:33, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:NBAND lacks sources.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 16:36, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.