Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohsin Abrar (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete . Materialscientist (talk) 11:31, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mohsin Abrar

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant coverage in reliable sources to support notability fails WP:GNG. GSS (talk|c|em) 10:29, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 10:29, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 10:29, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 10:29, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 10:29, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Delete. Fails WP:CREATIVE. The only article that mentions his is in gulf news, talking about Marketing Manager and the contest of Readers' photos. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 14:43, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete. Does not demonstrate notability - his photographs have only appeared in 2 magazines/newspapers and he is merely 1 of 100 winners in a competition. -Lopifalko (talk) 17:30, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - clearly fails GNG Spiderone 13:22, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete does not meet our inclusion guidelines for photographers.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:38, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.