Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muhammad Salih Bengali

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 14:45, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Muhammad Salih Bengali

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Very few references, and they only mention this person very briefly. Notability is not inherited, so who his predecessors and successors were does not denote his notability. Jaunpurzada (talk) 14:35, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and India. Shellwood (talk) 16:42, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:42, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Unfortunately, I tried my best to find anything about this scholar in Nuzhat al-Khawatir as claimed in the article that he has been mentioned by Abd al-Hayy Hasani, I did not find anything in any of the six volumes (quite possible that it is in the later two volumes). I then tried searching in this book, but I couldn't locate anything. I would appreciate any help. Ishaq Bhatti gives a paragraph to our subject here and refers back to two sources, of which I analyzed six volumes of the one. I will return back with a deeper search. ─ The Aafī (talk) 17:49, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per the nomination fails WP:GNG, and no significant coverage. বাক্যবাগীশ (talk) 13:28, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails GNG and BIO. Sources in article and BEFORE showed nothing from IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. Let me know if something is found. // Timothy :: talk 22:28, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.