Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Musafir.com

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:15, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Musafir.com

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

per WP:CORP, no notabilty and a very normal comapny Ibrahim.ID ✪ 22:30, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Websites, United Arab Emirates, and Maharashtra. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:45, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a company like this could potentially be notable (c.f. Expedia) but there is no real claim of notability in the article, and I can't find any external evidence either. Thparkth (talk) 22:40, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It definitely needs improvement and more citations but on Google Scholar you can find articles that referenced the company's information in published journals like this one, and it's published information on travel in the UAE is often cited by local newspapers like here, or here, and here. I think there are far less notable sites on here, and one that actually releases data on the local travel industry (albeit as a means of promotion) is worth having an article with basic information. ScholarofArabia (talk) 09:05, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion none of those links are substantially *about* musafir.com, which they would need to be in order to establish notability. Thparkth (talk) 12:22, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

all this links are Trivial mentions, not talking about this website directly.--Ibrahim.ID ✪ 16:07, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:35, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. There are a ton of results on Google News, ProQuest, etc., but none of them seem to be in-depth and independent enough to demonstrate notability. Most of what I'm seeing is either a passing mention (e.g. "according to Such-and-So from Musafir.com) or rephrased press releases that aren't actually independent content. As it stands I'm thinking the company isn't notable, particularly under the more exacting WP:NCORP standard, though I'm glad to reconsider if there are any solid sources that I've missed. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:23, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.