Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Software

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:24, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

National Software

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't seem to meet WP:NCORP. BuySomeApples (talk) 16:23, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Internet, Arizona, and Wisconsin. BuySomeApples (talk) 16:23, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:33, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 17:30, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The guideline states that in order for a company to be notable, the sources have to be secondary, independent, and reliable. There are three references that cite the "About" pages of companies, one reference citing a Google+ forum, two of them cite the subject's website, and the remaining one doesn't give significant coverage. Tarantula^TM (speak with me) (my legacy) 05:50, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Absolutely no significant coverage. PepperBeast (talk) 16:42, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.