Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nelson Lee (detective)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Withdrawn. OnlyFixingProse (talk) 09:53, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Nelson Lee (detective) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | [since nomination])
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Fails notability guidelines and written like resume. OnlyFixingProse (talk) 04:27, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and United Kingdom. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 04:38, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose deletion. Nelson Lee was a key character in popular fiction in the early 20th century. I have added three references to the Further reading sectionthat attests to this.
- Turner, ES (1948) Boys Will be Boys History of British boys' weeklies from Victorian times up to the 1950s.
- Andrew, Lucy (2017) The Boy Detective in Early British Children's Literature. Palgrave. page 96
- Watt & Green (2017) The Alternative Sherlock Holmes: Pastiches, Parodies and Copies Nml25 (talk) 08:57, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose deletion. Nelson Lee was a key character in popular fiction in the early 20th century. I have added three references to the Further reading sectionthat attests to this.
- Oppose deletion. The way it's written might be improved, but it's cited to six reliable secondary sources, so clearly a notable fictional character. --Nicknack009 (talk) 07:38, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
- Keep deletion rationale makes no sense, no evidence of WP:BEFORE, and one of several similarly unusual deletion nominations by a new editor. Jclemens (talk) 07:57, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
- I would agree. Very unusual deletion nominations. Feels more like a personal vendetta than someone who has competently assessed the articles' merits. Nml25 (talk) 09:00, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.