Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/No Limite 5 (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 15:44, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No Limite 5

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is completely unsourced. Plus Wikipedia is not a WP:CRYSTALBALL. Further to this, the article seems to have been largely copied from the Portugese page without any form of attribution. SɱαɾƚყPαɳƚʂ22 (Ⓣⓐⓛⓚ) 13:43, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. SɱαɾƚყPαɳƚʂ22 (Ⓣⓐⓛⓚ) 13:43, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The sources can be found on the Portugese version of the page. I'm not the biggest expert on adding them but I can try. And regarding the second statement, I've encountered numerous pages about upcoming movies and TV shows, that's why I added it. --Ulisseèbello (talk) 13:47, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That doesn't give the subject inherent notability. See WP:OTHER. – SɱαɾƚყPαɳƚʂ22 (Ⓣⓐⓛⓚ) 13:54, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete: per CSD G4, had been deleted before CommanderWaterford (talk) 15:02, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. As noted, it is clearly just a copy of the Portuguese, but nothing in that suggests that it's notable. If I were Brazilian I would vote Delete for that as well.Athel cb (talk) 18:25, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.