Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/North (Mary Dillon album)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 17:03, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

North (Mary Dillon album)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fairly unremarkable release. Per WP:GNG has not received coverage and is not notable per WP:NALBUMS as it has not charted or received coverage beyond it's track listing. Search of news sources done and coverage not found. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 22:45, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:46, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:50, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: I found some reliable sources which talk about the song, [1], [2], [3], [4] and [5]. With these, the article is good enough to pass WP:NALBUM. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 04:15, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Leaning keep: I don't agree with the editor above that all those sources are reliable, probably only No Depression and maybe More Than the Music. But if Ms. Dillon's website is to be believed, this was reviewed in at least two general music magazines and the UK's leading roots music magazine [6], so it looks like there is coverage in print form. Richard3120 (talk) 18:39, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I am convinced by Richard3120's analysis above. There are a few reliable reviews to support a basic stub article here, and the not-so-reliable sources can be used sparingly to flesh out the text a bit. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 23:47, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.