Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ohemaa Adjei Andoh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 00:40, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ohemaa Adjei Andoh

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:NPROF. Not convinced meets WP:GNG. Kj cheetham (talk) 12:28, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Kj cheetham (talk) 12:28, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Engineering-related deletion discussions. Kj cheetham (talk) 12:28, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:38, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ghana-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:38, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I agree that she does not meet WP:NPROF, but with the coverage in the UN's Africa Renewal magazine and serving as one of the mentors for the 2021 Ghana National Science and Maths Quiz, I think there are compelling arguments for WP:GNG. That being said, some of the coverage is repetitive and I am not familiar enough with Ghana to separate out the different sources. --DaffodilOcean (talk) 01:08, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also, to be clear, I added the detail about the Ghana National Science and Maths Quiz and had to look up the UN magazine. DaffodilOcean (talk) 01:10, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. The Africa Renewal magazine coverage doesn't count towards notability as it is a primary, non-independent source. Interviews have long been held insufficient for these purposes unless the author provides independent SIGCOV commentary on the subject, which is not present here. The Modern Ghana coverage is non-trivial, but primarily focuses on GIST rather than Andoh. News Ghana appears close to SIGCOV but also seems to be derived from an interview, so not independent. Salone Messenger is also mostly an interview, but there is substantial commentary on her in the introduction so it might work towards SIGCOV. The Edward Asare interview, however, does not contain sufficient independent analysis. If other reliable sources can be found giving her significant independent coverage she could meet GNG. JoelleJay (talk) 20:40, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:14, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:39, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Leaning delete unless more substantial coverage is unearthed. JoelleJay (talk) 03:58, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Further input required.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 00:48, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not yet notable--meets neither WP:PROF nor GNG--the references are not sigificant coverage., but PR. DGG ( talk ) 20:32, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.