Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oviaivo's polyhedra : annoviaivo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe decker ^talk 02:34, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oviaivo's polyhedra : annoviaivo

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Entirely original research. The web links at the bottom of the page are User:Moroplogo's personal website. All Google results for "annoviaivo" or "oviaivo" appear to be created by him. The reference listed on the page (Bonnie Stewart's Adventures Among the Toroids) doesn't use the term either. Any non-original content here is redundant with toroidal polyhedron.

The user is more active on the French wikipedia: a corresponding article may exist there (or have been deleted there), but I don't understand enough French to tell.

(~~The user has also been adding web links to his 3d models of things to various pages, which seems a little spammy.~~ Nevermind, they're not his models.) Apocheir (talk) 14:41, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, it certainly seems to be pure WP:OR, though I'd be pleased to learn otherwise. Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:13, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Repeating my comment from WP:ORN: There are no Google Scholar hits whatsoever for "annoviaivo". There is already a separate article for Toroidal polyhedron, and I see no published evidence that the family discussed in the article has been discussed elsewhere in the literature. It is certainly not discussed under the neologism "annoviaivo". The images can be used on other articles if necessary, but I do not think we lack for images in this area. Sławomir Biały (talk) 17:41, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.