Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Danso-Mensah

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:41, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Danso-Mensah

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Footballer who fails GNG and SPORTSBASIC. No professional or international career, no in-depth coverage. De-PRODed based on number of sources without any evaluation of what they actually say. BlameRuiner (talk) 06:51, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ghana-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:50, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:50, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:50, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:53, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:29, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 20:46, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no indication he was even in a pro game and being called up a couple of times for U20 and U23 is not a strong sign of notability. More importantly, I don't see significant coverage. --Mvqr (talk) 11:39, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, local Ghanaian coverage already on page is significant in my opinion.--Ortizesp (talk) 15:33, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:GNG; sources included in the article are not in-depth and are promotional in nature (e.g., boosting a viral video the subject posted). Jogurney (talk) 17:53, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.