Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philandry (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Philogyny. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:10, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Philandry

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The term 'philandry' does not appear in any dictionary save Wiktionary, where no verification or provenance is supplied. The dictionary refs given in the article are bogus. Deletion is requested because the subject lacks reliable supporting sources. The article was recreated with mini-rewritting in 2015, now need to be to deletion, why waste time the community... 『白猫しろねこ』^Обг. 22:45, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:19, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Philogyny, the only other article that mentions the topic. I browsed through the tidy pile of Google Scholar results for ["philandry"] and they're all passing uses of the term. Besides a definition (which varies from source to source), we'd get nothing usable. Google News turns up nothing, and neither does The Wikipedia Library. I'd gladly change my vote if someone finds some significant coverage, but I'm skeptical that it's out there. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 02:59, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.