[go: nahoru, domu]

Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philicity Asuako

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to List of Ghana women's international footballers. Liz Read! Talk! 23:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Philicity Asuako (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Redirect to List of Ghana women's international footballers. The subject has earned at least one cap for the Ghana women's national football team. I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG. JTtheOG (talk) 22:08, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep: If this subject was an English or Australian international, I don’t think we will be having this conversation because their pages would not be nominated in the first place. I think you should stop picking on articles on African subjects because they are east targets for deletion. You don’t expect African articles to have as much citations as their western counterparts. Amaekuma (talk) 22:15, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Comment @Amaekuma: The majority of articles I nominate for deletion have not been African. I even nominated a European player in my very next nomination. Not to mention I have created dozens of articles on African athletes and politicians. I certainly hope you've created more than me if that's the road you want to take. Thankfully, that's not too much of an indicator of anything, so I'd appreciate if you stopped the accusations. JTtheOG (talk) 23:13, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
We need to have high quality sources for BLPs, that's non-negotiable. I have no problem with JT's nominations as it's clear that they are made based on lack of evidence of meeting our notability guidelines rather than any other characteristics. Banning people from nominating African subjects would be an absurd rule to put in place and not something I've ever seen on Wikipedia before (I've heard of topic bans but not anything like that). If sources showing WP:GNG can be found then simply present these in the relevant discussion and/or add them to the article and the article will be kept. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 20:01, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.