Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pierre-Luc Paquette

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 19:57, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pierre-Luc Paquette

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Minimally sourced biography of a person notable only as a political organizer. This is not an "inherently" notable role under WP:NPOL, so getting a person into Wikipedia for this requires showing that they clear WP:GNG on the sourcing -- but other than one news article announcing his death, this is otherwise referenced entirely to primary sources that are not support for notability at all, such as press releases self-published by his own party and a deadlinked directory entry. As usual, he isn't automatically notable enough for a Wikipedia article just because it's possible to offer technical verification that he existed: he would need to show real reliable source coverage about his work in the role, demonstrating specific, significant and substantive accomplishments, to warrant a Wikipedia article. Bearcat (talk) 18:29, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 18:29, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 18:29, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Kolma8 (talk) 20:47, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I am not finding anything to meet notabilityJeepday (talk) 14:29, 10 December 2020 (UTC) for this person.[reply]
Delete per WP:SNOW and WP:MILL. This was a provincial-level political operative. Bearian (talk) 01:57, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete lack of coverage in RS. Clearly does not meet notability guidelines. Habiliment (talk) 11:18, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.