Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pop Life (TV series)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:05, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pop Life (TV series)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Was unable to find sources in a WP:BEFORE. Prod contested for no reason. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 15:05, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 15:05, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
comment reason given for removing prod was “ decline prod. No evidence of WP:BEFORE being performed”, which seems reasonable. Artw (talk) 15:27, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
So I have to spell out that I did a WP:BEFORE literally every time? Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 15:46, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
would suggest that when a reason is given you just write “prod was contested” and leave it at that. Artw (talk) 16:51, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe if people didn't mass deprod everything without explaining why they're doing so... Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:32, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That’s a situation entirely of your own creation and has no bearing. Artw (talk)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Artw (talk) 18:21, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

01:41, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Artw (talk) 18:23, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep There's some coverage out there, mostly under the individual titles of the documentaries, though none of them make it sound like the series was super substantial. Artw (talk) 18:26, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep This article could do with additional information but three different, independent, sources are used so this removes any issues regarding independent references. Rillington (talk) 11:56, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:21, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as now has references to significant coverage in reliable sources such as The Guardian and The Irish Independent added to the article so that WP:GNG is passed and deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 00:35, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Following the addition of more references, I have now moved from weak keep to keep. Rillington (talk) 13:17, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.