Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pure (2005 film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nom withdrawn (non-admin closure) RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 00:24, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pure (2005 film)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

~~Non notable film with one questionable capsule review. PROD was removed because "CAST was added", but adding cast doesn't establish notability. Donaldd23 (talk) 23:43, 16 June 2020 (UTC)~~[reply]

Nomination withdrawn, as improvements to article have established notability. Donaldd23 (talk) 19:26, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Donaldd23 (talk) 23:43, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Donaldd23 (talk) 23:43, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions. Nfitz (talk) 22:07, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep award-winning film. Added a review from a national paper, and other references. Nfitz (talk) 22:35, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:45, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Per the expansion work done post-nomination. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 07:13, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above. TheImaCow (talk) 20:44, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per WP:HEY as the article has been improved since nomination with the addition of a number of references that show significant coverage in multiple reliable sources as well as winning a notable award so deletion is no longer necessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 00:18, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.