Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Repercussion (film)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 11:14, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
- Repercussion (film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable film, obvious COI from creator, does not meet WP:NF or WP:N in general BOVINEBOY2008 15:13, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
- Comment-the only thing notable about it IMO is that it was shot in just 3 hours! (which yes as amusing as that sounds, delete, unless if somehow this manages to be nominated for an Oscar or something...yes being sarcastic about it getting nominated) Wgolf (talk) 19:59, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:39, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:39, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:39, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Delete or Userfy per failing WP:NFF... an unreleased film whose production does not have the coverage to meet WP:GNG. If this changes after release, the article can be undeleted. Schmidt, Michael Q. 12:29, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - fails NFF. Cult of Green (talk) 01:20, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.