Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rota (schedule)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge into Timetable. seresin ( ¡? ) 07:12, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rota (schedule)

Likely non-notable; I was not able to find any sources, and article has not been eferenced and gives no claim to notability Samuel Tan 02:39, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for lack of verification, lack of notability as a subject and being suspiciously OR. Eddie.willers (talk) 01:28, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge a short definition into timetable. This is British slang for rotation barely known in the US but there is nothing particularly special about it. One could consider shift work as a target but i think that's too specific. --Dhartung | Talk 04:30, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into timetable as essentially the same thing. As an aside rotation is likely to be the source of the term rota but it's hardly slang - it has it's own standalone entry in a British English dictionary that does not mention rotation and the term is in everyday use by most people including buisnesses and the like. Dpmuk (talk) 21:21, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Further to my comment above, yes timetable and rota are eseentially the same thing but it should be noted that Rota only normally applies to people (i.e. not to trains, flights etc). Dpmuk (talk) 00:07, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per User:Dhartung --T-rex 20:13, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep or merge into timetable - I've added information on liturgical rotas. I'm afraid that this may be barely known amongst young people today, but is quite common in Protestant churches. You could also userfy to User:Bearian's space for further work at User:Bearian/Rota (schedule). Bearian'sBooties (talk) 02:25, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Which is what I've just done. :-) Bearian'sBooties (talk) 02:27, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.