[go: nahoru, domu]

Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Royal Order of the Golden Fire Dog (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 21:19, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Royal Order of the Golden Fire Dog (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to be a real order, and the supposed royal house does not appear to be legitimate or mentioned in any media outside self-published works CoconutOctopus talk 16:26, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I'm not sure this is even a thing, the crests used here look like a job made in Microsoft Paint. I don't find any sources, facebook is about the best. The government of Ghana has nothing about this order on their various sites. Oaktree b (talk) 16:38, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You can search .gh sites, for Ghanian ones, nothing notable comes up. Oaktree b (talk) 16:40, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
hello, I am sending you a link to the site https://www.royalhousemim.org/armsorders. In addition, from what it seems to me, it works on the following principle: Royal Order of the Lion of Godenu.
link https://uchterhous.org/knights-2/elementor-1149/kingdom-of-sefwi-obeng-mim/.
https://www.reddit.com/user/HeraldicArtist/comments/dgxubr/order_of_wear_of_grand_cross_of_the_royal_order/
https://docplayer.net/198671043-2020-development-report.html
https://www.griffofocasusa.org/delegate
I found many, many links about the Royal House of Sefwi Beng-Mim. There is a lot of information about their charity work. If the article is wrong or something needs to be improved, please let me know what is wrong and it will be corrected.
I don't think the page has been removed. There are many sites just look for that confirm the law. RH poland (talk) 23:41, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • These are the same sources that were linked to in the last AFD that resulted in deletion, and the exact same explanation from then still stands - these are all either not reliable sources, not significant coverage of the subject, not secondary sources, or, in most cases, a combination of all three. Rorshacma (talk) 01:36, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.