Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandra Sakata
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was withdrawn (cf.). --BDD (talk) 22:23, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Sandra Sakata (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Delete: article of dubious notability. Quis separabit? 01:25, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Notable per substantial coverage in reliable independent sources. Discussed as a leading proponent of the art to wear movement and as a successful and influential fashionista, retailer, and trend setter. Candleabracadabra (talk) 01:53, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:12, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:12, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:12, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Candleabracadabra. Sufficient sources are included in the article and more appears to exist at GNews and GBooks. --Arxiloxos (talk) 05:59, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per above - the article is sufficiently sourced. Mabalu (talk) 18:00, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.