[go: nahoru, domu]

Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanlam Challenge Shield

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. plicit 00:04, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sanlam Challenge Shield (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non notable and short lived set of friendly games. Different match reports mention different versions of the sponsor name. Google searches not finding any substantial coverage about the competition only individual match reports of friendlies with passing mentions. noq (talk) 15:28, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Rugby union-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:45, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:45, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:45, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Per nom. Fails WP:NRIVALRY for me as there's not enough coverage of the rivalry between the sides, and personally I don't there's any at all. Just a set of friendly matches. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 09:13, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - I do not think there is evidence of notability and would be inclined to support the view expressed by others that these were just a series of friendlies. The Saracens F.C. article has an "International relationships" section - these matches are not currently mentioned there, but perhaps they could be and this would probably be sufficient coverage. Dunarc (talk) 20:34, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.