Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanne Wohlenberg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 14:45, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sanne Wohlenberg

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article was created in 2012 with the edit summary saying: Page created - source IMDB. No sources have been added since in those ten years. Even if sourcing was added for the very little current info, they still seems unnotable by Wikipedia's standards for WP:BLP. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 00:21, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment First hit is someone with the same name in Variety, that worked on Chernobyl and Vikings. Might be notable, I'd have to really look to confirm. Oaktree b (talk) 02:28, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Women, and United Kingdom. Shellwood (talk) 07:48, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I have added citations to indicate her role in producing a mini-series, upcoming TV show, and Dr. Who episodes. Since the article is no longer solely sourced to IMDB, I removed that notice. DaffodilOcean (talk) 12:53, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The subject meets the notability criteria by virtue of her producership of Doctor Who. Even if she had done no other work in television and film, this would be sufficient. Note there is an article for this specific job: List_of_Doctor_Who_producers DavidFarmbrough (talk) 15:15, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Notability is determined by sourcing and coverage by reliable sources not by actual credits. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:40, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. She passes WP:CREATIVE criterion #3 in three times over note: The person has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work. In addition, such work must have been the primary subject of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews (emphasis mine) i.e. the things she made must get reviews, they all absolutely do. E.g. Wallander (British TV series), Chernobyl (miniseries), Doctor Who (WP:CREATIVE requires more than one episode, she did Doctor Who three times) all meet this criteria. CT55555 (talk) 03:44, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Also she won an Emmy! I just added that in! That's a pass at WP:ANYBIO also. I think this must absolutely remove any doubt. CT55555 (talk) 03:56, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:47, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:33, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.