Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sahi school health programme

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. L Faraone 00:47, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sahi school health programme

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article was already a "speedy delete" and deemed to be for promotion and advertizement. While I don't have anything personal against a non-profit org such as this, I am not sure if this is notable, so I opened an AfD. Tyros1972 Talk 06:57, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 10:05, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. This doesn't read like an advertisement to me at all. It's a simple description of the organization's aims and activities that doesn't use any kind of promotional language or hype. In any case, that would be an issue for clean-up, not deletion. The only issue remaining is notability; I didn't find much in English but I'd expect there to be more coverage in Arabic than English. It's important to consider sources in other languages: imagine how much of Wikipedia's content on Europe and North America we'd delete if we only looked for sources in Arabic, for example (or Hindi or Mandarin). Dricherby (talk) 10:40, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
comment I removed a very small amount of promotional language. Given that it covered multiple schools and involved notable people and organisations I considered that A7 did not apply either, and declined the speedy delete in order to keep it. I do not consider that the proposer actually has any valid reason to delete it. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:08, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 07:18, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 17:35, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.