Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sebastian Payne

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:07, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sebastian Payne[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability of the individual is questionable, and as I've noted before his article is written like a resume. PlateOfToast (talk) 02:07, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Probably passes AUTHOR, a few book reviews found [1], [2], [3], but the sourcing used now in the article isn't helpful. Oaktree b (talk) 02:21, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Journalism, Politics, and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:08, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep quite a well known figure, has been a guest on Question Time (TV programme) for example and I think he meets the WP:JOURNALIST criteria of being an 'important figure' as his career changes have been reported on independently.[4]. Agree the article reads like a resume though, needs work. Orange sticker (talk) 09:11, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep WP:SIGCOV is present, notable as per WP:JOURNALIST criterium 1 Vorann Gencov (talk) 06:42, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Passes WP:GNG and WP:AUTHOR based on sources presented above. Article needs cleanup, not deletion. Sal2100 (talk) 17:07, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.