Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/StereoGraphics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Lenny Lipton#Stereography. MBisanz ^talk 16:29, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

StereoGraphics[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks notoriety. Google search produces no info from reliable sources concerning Lipton's contribution to 3D/stereoscopy. Violates guidelines barring promotion. Tapered (talk) 22:42, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:01, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:01, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:27, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:27, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - StereoGraphics and CrystalEyes are WP:N. Added WP:RS, reduced Lipton's mentions. Article could use more content, categories and infobox. StrayBolt (talk) 00:02, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Reference 1 is small step to WP:N, but nowhere near sufficient Lots of non-notable enterprises have Bloomberg profiles. Reference 2 is substantial, and a secondary source, but the coverage is brief. Reference 3 is an interview with Lipton—hence a primary source, and can't confer notoriety, though it can be used for bits of information and interest in an article. Reference 4 may be too much of a promotional website/journal for reliability, and the mentions of RealD are trivial, anyway. Reference 5 is promotional, ergo not a reliable source. Not enough to confer WP:N Tapered (talk) 08:49, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Perhaps this could be redirected to the article on Lipton. Tapered (talk) 09:12, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Lenny Lipton as the notable founder. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 04:00, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:27, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:06, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Lenny_Lipton#Stereography; no need to maintain a separate article on an entity that's not independently notable of the creator. K.e.coffman (talk) 21:38, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Summation of the situation as of now. I believe I shredded the "Keep" entry in matter of fact fashion. I suggested a willingness to redirect, and the only 2 subsequent comments have been for "redirect." Tapered (talk) 06:48, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.