[go: nahoru, domu]

Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunil Sihag

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Star Mississippi 03:20, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sunil Sihag (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I declined the speedy delete due to the comments on the talk page and at least some assertion of notability. I believe it should be deleted but I'd like to have more discussion and come to a consensus in the community. I'm unconvinced on the notability of the individual meeting WP:GNG and I have concerns about WP:ADV. Might be a good idea to review this from a WP:BLP point of view, and the sources provided could use a check from others (a bit of a language barrier for me).--Paul McDonald (talk) 02:53, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  1. It seems WP:PROMO
  2. It was rejected many times at AfD and then the editor seems to have bypassed AfD
  3. If I understand the comments on the talk page correctly, the editor who created the article is saying it was created by a public relations ("PR") person/agent. Now that is not 100% clear, but it seems like what they are saying, which is probably why it seems like WP:PROMO. CT55555 (talk) 04:02, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.