Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tafsir Urwa-Tul-Wusqa
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:51, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Tafsir Urwa-Tul-Wusqa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I PRODD this article it was deprodded by Kvng with the reason "77 incoming links indicate potential importance". No edits have been made to the article or sources added since then. The article is a three sentence uncited article about an Urdu tafsir. It has been tagged with multiple issues since 2016. Both "further reading" links are dead. There is no English language coverage of the book. I don't know Urdu but there also appears to be almost no Urdu coverage of this book either. In Urdu, like in English, just book piracy websites seem to show up. It fails all the criteria for WP:BK imo Zaynab1418 (talk) 01:04, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Unsure of the sources found in Gbooks, none seem to be about this topic. Oaktree b (talk) 01:06, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Religion and Islam. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 05:53, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: Hypothetical sources don't need entertaining. Iskandar323 (talk) 06:39, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.