Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thayillum family
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 10:56, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Thayillum family (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Unverifiable, provides no reliable independent sources, and none locatable via google. Delete. Horselover Frost (talk) 03:43, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. TallNapoleon (talk) 05:46, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete by all means. --GDibyendu (talk) 05:36, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:27, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:36, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No sources in sight. VG ☎ 04:59, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. YellowMonkey (click here to choose Australia's next top model) 07:36, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Unsourced. Eatabullet (talk) 08:36, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I suggest that the editors who are all saying "no sources in sight" and variants read the article again. The second paragraph explicitly states the title, author, publisher, and year of publication of the book that this information is taken from. Note that the nominator here is addressing the reliability and independence of that source, not saying that the article does not cite anything. You are not helping the closing administrator by supplying weak rationales that are quite obviously contradicted by the article at hand. Please evaluate the source that is already cited, and also look for other sources. That is what will help the discussion to come to the correct decision. Uncle G (talk) 09:29, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Being one of the oldest Christian families in Kerala is an insufficient claim for notability. Clarityfiend (talk) 10:03, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.