Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Grustle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 14:30, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Grustle

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

DELETE - This album is neither released nor is it notable. JBsupreme (talk) 06:55, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 01:42, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:14, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Only source of the information is a blog entry. Anything else to change my mind? --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 00:35, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with the artist's profile. The album has been mentioned by Lil' Scrappy in numerous interviews but I don't think that makes it notable enough for its own article just yet. Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 04:29, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fails notability per WP:MUSIC. Searching finds no significant coverage in reliable, third-party, sources. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 05:13, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:CRYSTAL and WP:HAMMER. The album has not been released, there is no tracklist, and didn't get any coverage due to its upcoming release. McMarcoP (talk) 08:02, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.