Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Left Ear

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:29, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Left Ear

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject of the article fails WP:GNG and also violates WP:CRYSTAL. ~~In addition Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information~~. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 23:43, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:14, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:14, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep with gratitude to Timmyshin for providing the source indicating that not only had this [[WP:NRVE|well-covered topic] begun filming, but that it has completed and is in post production. WP:GNGis met, WP:NFF (paragraph 3) is met, and WP:CRYSTAL is not violated. I am quite happy to change my !vote. Redirect per policy to Alec Su where it can be spoken of and sourced as his directorial debut[1] until such time as it begins filming. And sorry nominator, but a sourced film stub dealing directly and in some detail about a planned film is not WP:INDISCRIMINATE, though it might certainly be premature. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 21:05, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Micheal. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 05:53, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry Wikicology, but I had to change my !vote per the provided source] showing thatWP:NFF (paragraph 3) is now met. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 07:50, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"The shooting of the film finished on Nov 18 and it is now in post-production." Timmyshin (talk) 04:02, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks Timmyshin . Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 07:50, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as per WP:NFF. ([2][3][4][5][6])--Antigng (talk) 02:02, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:NFF, films that have already begun shooting, but have not yet been publicly released (theatres or video), should generally not have their own articles unless the production itself is notable per the notability guidelines.Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 06:19, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, Wikicology... but it is now completed and in post production and meets the notability guidelines.

. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 07:50, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination Withdrawn: I hereby withdrawn my nomination per significant coverages to reliable sources enough to establish the subject notability, provided by Timmyshin. Big thanks to Timmyshin. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 13:30, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Now to use the many sources to flesh out the stub. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 22:39, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.