Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Top Ranking

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep - article has since been enhanced. ——RyanLupin • (talk) 10:06, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Top Ranking

Unreleased and as such un-notable album. Only references/links are to reseller. Mfield (talk) 05:43, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:01, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I don't think it's the album itself that's unreleased, i think it means "containing [previously] unreleased material". tomasz. 14:12, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 19:56, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, unreleased and does not yet meet WP:MUSIC right now. JBsupreme (talk) 08:55, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Protonk (talk) 04:49, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Mixtapes generally aren't notable. I see nothing that makes this one notable. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Chirps•Clams•Chowder)} 17:04, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as it is a mixtape by one of the most well-known DJs (Diplo) and a very popular artist. His previous mixtape in the exact same fashion, with MIA instead of Santogold, was found to be notable enough to have remained on Wikipedia for four years. Why is this any different? 63.231.90.185 (talk) 07:32, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- To demonstrate notability of this mix-tape, please show evidence of non-trivial coverage by reliable third party publications. JBsupreme (talk) 07:40, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as I have updated the article with references from third party publications. BambooBanga (talk) 03:21, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per BambooBanga. nice job, mate. tomasz. 15:39, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.