Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trans-Humber Consumer Research Panel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 05:41, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Trans-Humber Consumer Research Panel

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am unable to find evidence of notability for this panel. Although some of its work is mentioned in some studies, it doesn't appear to be the focus of those studies and none are highly cited. The article creator redirected it to a parent organization but @PamD: contested it. so we're here. Star Mississippi 02:19, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Star Mississippi 02:19, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Star Mississippi 02:19, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Star Mississippi 02:19, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 02:20, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I couldn't find any significant coverage anywhere, and the article's references don't help. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 03:20, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Yes, please delete this page. I'm not even sure that the group is still going. Your best bet to find that out would be to contact the NHS trust directly via https://www.hey.nhs.uk/research/research-reviewer/ Dj manton (talk) 12:37, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Source	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
Source assessment table: prepared by User:rsjaffe
InvoDirect Database	"This online resource is a directory of networks, groups and organisations that support active public involvement in NHS..."	✘ No
National Institute for Health Research Annual Report	No mention in the report	✘ No
HYCCN Annual Report	? Dead link	? Unknown
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.