Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Truth & Lies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Beams (album). NW (Talk) 02:06, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Truth & Lies

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No assertion of notability. Fails WP:MUSIC. Crotchety Old Man (talk) 18:18, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Didn't chart, no notability established in any other way. Drmies (talk) 19:01, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete - unless sources can be found. -WarthogDemon 19:15, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Beams (album) per WP:NSONGS: "Most songs[note 5] do not rise to notability for an independent article and should redirect to another relevant article, such as for the songwriter, a prominent album or for the artist who prominently performed the song." Rlendog (talk) 16:11, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NW (Talk) 01:28, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. It never charted and it has no individual claims for notability. McMarcoP (talk) 08:35, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- Cybercobra (talk) 09:09, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails notability and unlikely search term to justify redirect. Niteshift36 (talk) 15:43, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.