Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vocality International
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 18:48, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Vocality International (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
PRODded with the reason enough to avoid an A7, but a BEFORE identifies only churnalism and PR about this company's acquisition, nothing to establish ORG notability but correctly declined (courtesy @Salvidrim!:) as I missed a 2006 prod in the deleted history. My reasons for deletion remain the same, I just don't think this hits the notability bar. Star Mississippi 14:33, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Star Mississippi 14:33, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Star Mississippi 14:33, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Star Mississippi 14:33, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 15:58, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete or redirect: I added information and refs on the 2016 acquisition by Cubic Corporation, but neither thatroutine coverage nor anything else found in my searches demonstrate that it attained notability. Although the purchase is unmentioned on the Cubic page, a redirect might be a WP:ATD option. AllyD (talk) 21:39, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.