Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WinRumors

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to The Verge. Star Mississippi 13:37, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WinRumors

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Believe it Dosen't meet WP:NWEB 1keyhole (talk) 16:10, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media, Technology, and Websites. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:31, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with The Verge. Blog by current The Verge journalist Tom Warren operated for 2 years. Gets some mentions by reliable sources for its reports on Microsoft, but not seeing enough context for an article. IgelRM (talk) 18:59, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Redirect suffices.IgelRM (talk) 13:32, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 02:36, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Any other opinions about the suggested Merger?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:50, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: An article about a blog which was operated by an industry journalist during 2010-11. While reports by a journalist reporting on a major firm's changing business plans are bound to get some traction, I don't see them or the Blog's award nomination as sufficient to demonstrate attained notability. I also don't see a merge with the article about The Verge, its author's later employer, as feasible: Warren is not mentioned in that article and any content merge would be WP:UNDUE. AllyD (talk) 08:42, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: As per nomination Samuel R Jenkins (talk) 06:06, 30 April 2023 (UTC) Blocked sock. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 03:34, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.