Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/You're Still Not Safe In a Japanese Car
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. No redirect as there is no valid target. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 18:07, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- You're Still Not Safe In a Japanese Car (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
DEPRODed by the Creator w/o Explanation, No signs of notability per WP:NSONG, WP:BEFORE gave me no significant coverage CommanderWaterford (talk) 18:01, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. CommanderWaterford (talk) 18:01, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
- To be fair, the "no indication of notability" is wrong, it clearly has an indication for being a #1 single...Whether it warrants a standalone is another matter. EGGIDICAE🥚 18:16, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Praxidicae ? You know that I (almost) always trust your experienced opinion but I checked all google searches now 3 times and there is absolute no indication of being a No. 1 Hit ??! CommanderWaterford (talk) 18:58, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- I'm not saying it's necessarily accurate, I'm just pointing out that it is a claim. EGGIDICAE🥚 18:59, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- Claim? I checked the article's history and it never said that this was a #1 single. Instead, it only included a false link to a list of such songs from 1983. A blue link is not a statement of any kind, much less one of notability. The article did say that it was a "one-hit wonder" which is something you say about a musician, and saying that about a song, as this article does, makes no logical sense. Honestly, it did not take me too long to figure all that out. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 01:17, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
- Go have that fight with the WP:CCS crowd, not me. Thanks. EGGIDICAE🥚 02:10, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
- The "Credible Claim of Significance" standard is immaterial for something that is neither credible nor a claim while saying nothing about significance. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 13:26, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
- Go have that fight with the WP:CCS crowd, not me. Thanks. EGGIDICAE🥚 02:10, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
- Claim? I checked the article's history and it never said that this was a #1 single. Instead, it only included a false link to a list of such songs from 1983. A blue link is not a statement of any kind, much less one of notability. The article did say that it was a "one-hit wonder" which is something you say about a musician, and saying that about a song, as this article does, makes no logical sense. Honestly, it did not take me too long to figure all that out. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 01:17, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
- I'm not saying it's necessarily accurate, I'm just pointing out that it is a claim. EGGIDICAE🥚 18:59, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete To be fair, the indication is there, but is clearly wrong because the page of those number one singles, doesn't feature this song. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 14:44, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - See above for more on the article's false information. Also, the musician has no article of his own; if you click on his name it goes to the John Goldsmith disambig page and none of the guys there are this musician. The song was absolutely not a hit and it is beyond obscure. Discogs says it exists and someone is trying to sell a vinyl copy on eBay, and that's all I could find. The article also attempts a link to the musician's AllMusic page, which is empty. Not even close to the requirements at WP:NSONG and we could also cite WP:EXIST. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 01:17, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.