Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yougothassled
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete per WP:SNOW Mandsford 23:05, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Yougothassled (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A neologism with no evidence of use anywhere. Created by User:Yougothassled indicating that they made it up themselves. (PROD was removed) SmartSE (talk) 13:00, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Neologism, that's it. EEng (talk) 13:27, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No evidence of notability; WP:MADEUP. -- Rrburke (talk) 14:39, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, unsourced neologism that's really disguised spam for a website. NawlinWiki (talk) 15:16, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. What NawlinWiki said. — Satori Son 15:38, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete – per nom. ttonyb (talk) 15:47, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per NawlinWiki. Novice7 | Talk 16:36, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I couldn't figure out whether this dumb expression was pronounced "You go the sled" or "You Goth a sled"-- turns out it's neither "You got Hassled"-- a prank buried among the billions of videos on YouTube. Come back when it goes viral. Mandsford 16:58, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Of course it's made up.--Zokniaw (talk) 19:21, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Move along, nothing to see here. --Ezhuks (talk) 01:23, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:52, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.