Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zyklon (Morey's Piers) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 17:55, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Zyklon (Morey's Piers)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This roller coaster is a mass-produced roller coaster. There are several roller coasters that have the exact same layout/characteristics of this roller coaster. A search on Google and Yahoo returned no reliable sources regarding the roller coaster that could be included to support the notability of the topic. Dom497 (talk) 21:09, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Themeparkgc, McDoobAU93, Astros4477, and JlACEer: Just thought you guys might want to pitch in your thoughts.--Dom497 (talk) 21:11, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per nominator. There's nothing here about why this particular version of this design is notable. In fact, there's almost nothing here except for a prose version of the infobox. --McDoob AU93 23:11, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Non-notable article created by banned user. Andrew³²⁷ 04:31, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

While I agree it was started by a user who is indeed now banned, WP:AGF suggests that shouldn't be a factor in its potential deletion at this point. The ban came after the article was created and after the previous AFD resulted in "keep". --McDoob AU93 21:12, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with you that an article should not be deleted merely because its author was later banned, but this particular article is also non-notable for the reasons discussed here in greater detail. Andrew³²⁷ 04:13, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Pinfari built over 200 Zyklon coasters. This is just one of 200 small portable coasters — nothing notable about that.—JlACEer (talk) 15:05, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:11, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. -Pete (talk) 23:41, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.