[go: nahoru, domu]
Jump to content

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 September 15

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< September 14
September 16 >

September 15

[edit]

Category:Scholastic Confucianism in Korea

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 23:58, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now. There's no need to have this category with a single page in it. It's just not helpful for navigation. The page is already in Korean Confucianism Mason (talk) 21:26, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Israeli philosophy

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Noting that the keep supporter seems to argue for this category's deletion. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 23:59, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: This is a redudant category layer that isn't helpful for navigation. There isn't a Israeli philosophy page. Mason (talk) 20:35, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Medieval mosques

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 September 22#Medieval mosques

Category:Films directed by Vincent Moon

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 23:56, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: The subject article was deleted at AFD. Graham87 (talk) 17:31, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Two of the three articles in the category refer to music videos in an article about the song. The third (and the redirect) refer to documentaries about bands. This might have been too small even if the article about the director had not been deleted. Walsh90210 (talk) 20:06, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Cultural depictions of Ken Griffey Jr.

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 23:56, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Delete; only one category and one article. Both are in appropriate subcats of Category:Baseball culture so no need to merge. Omnis Scientia (talk) 14:34, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Rugby league plays

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 23:55, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Dual merge with no objection to recreate if there is more. Only two articles. Omnis Scientia (talk) 14:26, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Lighthouse of Alexandria

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 September 22#Category:Lighthouse of Alexandria

Category:People with cervical spine fracture

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 23:55, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: A hodge-podge of people who died by hanging or other trauma, people who were paralyzed from an injury, and people who suffered a minor injury. Generally not a defining characteristic. Walsh90210 (talk) 04:41, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Wikipedia non-empty soft redirected categories

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. (non-admin closure) —Compassionate727 (T·C) 19:16, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: See discussion at Template talk:Category redirect#Category:Wikipedia soft redirected categories which are double redirects – the Wikipedia prefix is not needed here and renaming promotes consistency with Category:Non-empty disambiguation categories. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 03:28, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Don Young

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 23:54, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Practically everything in each of these categories is not "defined" by the politician, and are better served as just being interlinked. The bulk of each page are just the elections they were in or a thing named after the person. They're all made by the same category creator. Mason (talk) 21:41, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Omnis Scientia (talk) 13:52, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep There are a variety of reasons why I made these. Some of them were extremely long serving politicians, many of them are really significant names in their areas. Young and Stevens have dates and places named after themselves. Barney Frank is a significant LGBT figure. Walz is literally the Democratic nominee for VP. Youngkin has his own article for his tenure as governor. Manchin has his own article for his own political positions. You have to keep them. Keep all of these. Vinnylospo (talk) 17:18, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I want to keep some of these because honestly. I just feel like all of the pages or categories I try to make often get removed. This is all in good faith. I seriously don’t mean any harm. When I make these articles, I have a real sense of accomplishment. I get really upset when this stuff gets removed. It almost feels like I wasted my time and I feel like no matter how often I try, I feel it leaves no impact and it’s removed. I’m just rambling here. I’m just very upset. Please don’t take any of this wrong. I really love making articles. It’s truly my passion. But how can I feel comfortable creating when I sometimes feel my work will get removed regardless? Vinnylospo (talk) 06:44, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please don't double vote Mason (talk) 20:24, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I will fix the links to this nomination.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 02:35, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The election they were in should be covered by eponymous categories. Vinnylospo is doing necessary work here. Dimadick (talk) 12:54, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Chemical looping technologies

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 September 23#Category:Chemical looping technologies

Category:The Numbers not in Wikidata

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 23:51, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: To move where the articles have been recategorized to via the {{Cite The Numbers}} temp. Consistency with Category:The Numbers ID different from Wikidata. Trailblazer101 (talk) 05:51, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy redirect. There's no need to discuss this, especially since the proposed target "rename" already exists as a category, meaning the only thing that needs to happen is a categoryredirect. Bearcat (talk) 13:40, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: The rename has already taken place in the template; should we keep a redirect?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 00:28, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I should've been more clear with my relisting comment: There is consensus we should either redirect or just delete. Which one should we do?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 00:24, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2024_September_15&oldid=1250993316"