[go: nahoru, domu]
Jump to content

Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2010 April 20

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

20 April 2010

[edit]
Suspected copyright violations (CorenSearchBot reports)

SCV for 2010-04-20 Edit

[edit]
Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)
[edit]
Extended content

Like SaaS, MaaS is implemented by shifting the responsibility of the enterprise’s mobile infrastructure and management system to the service provider. It intends to eliminate the njeed for additional hardware and staff; yet, it accelerates the implementation of a mobility platform and increases user productivity by increasing reliability, scalability, and security.

and pdf:

MaaS shifts the responsibility of the enterprise’s mobile infrastructure and management system to the software and service provider. It eliminates the need for additional hardware and staff. It accelerates the implementation and increases user productivity by increasing reliability, scalability, and security.

and also Key charateristics:
  • Available Everywhere:The cloud-based nature of MaaS addresses the Internet everywhere reality. It enables user productivity and IT controls anywhere, anytime—free of the boundary of the corporate perimeter.
  • Provides Universal Connectivity and Access Controls: It simplifies connectivity for end users by providing a single, secure, universal user experience, supported by a single identity management and mobile access control capability for IT.
  • Support for all Devices: A MaaS platform provides the tools to manage all desktops, laptops, and handheld devices.
  • Support for any Application: No single vendor can provide all the technologies needed to create an enterprise mobility platform. The MaaS platform is a single production image that integrates infrastructure and security applications from multiple vendors.
  • Ensures Endpoint and Data Security: The hardware and software settings and configurations of the mobile devices should be controlled to prevent unauthorized or undesired changes or compromise. A MaaS solution provides enterprise-grade endpoint and data security to all mobile assets no matter where they are located and how they are connected. Data is protected through different techniques like encryption, backup and authorization validation.
  • ...
  • Consolidated Operations and Reporting: The mobility management platform lessens the IT department’s administrative burden of management and control of mobile devices. On-demand reporting is available to Operations, Security, Audit, and Compliance teams to assess and monitor the health and policy compliance posture of mobile endpoints.
versus
  • Available Everywhere – a MaaS platform should be cloud-based and provide user productivity and IT control anywhere, anytime—free of the boundary of the corporate perimeter.
  • Universal Connectivity and Access Controls – a MaaS platform should simplify connectivity for end users by providing a single, universal user experience, underpinned with a single identity management and mobile access control capability for IT.
  • Support for all Devices – a MaaS platform should provide the tools to manage all desktops, laptops, and handheld devices, and, in the future, virtualized desktops, as well.
  • Support for any Application – a MaaS platform should be able to integrate infrastructure and security applications from multiple vendors into a single production image. This is because no single vendor can provide all the technologies needed to create an enterprise mobility platform.
  • Highly Secure – a MaaS platform should provide enterprise-grade endpoint and data security to all mobile assets no matter where they are located and how they are connected.
  • Consolidated Operations and Reporting – a MaaS platform should integrate all facets of mobile connectivity, mobility management, and mobile security into a single operational platform console, in order to eliminate security and operational gaps and to improve business efficiency and the scalability of mobile deployments.
That's all of it I see at the moment that duplicate the pdf source. Also, just in case you haven't noticed the author has some comments at the AfD. VernoWhitney (talk) 22:11, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
P.S. There appear to be some COI issues here too. Wikipedia:Changing_username/Simple/Archive70#Fiberlink_.E2.86.92_PCJain VernoWhitney (talk) 22:15, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! That's very helpful. :) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 23:57, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This may actually be a case of reverse infringement. I did not find the Mill and Hammer site when I searched for sources for Adirondack lean-to in March. I note, too, that the creator of the page added links to the Mill and Hammer site last week. The editor does not appear to have made other contributions to Wikipedia. Cnilep (talk) 20:00, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It deepens: The page Adirondack Lean-to was created by User:Jonnygorgo. The company Mill and Hammer appears to be operated by Jonathan Gorgas. One individual may have created the Wikipedia page, then recycled its content on a commercial web site. This seems to violate the spirit of Wikipedia's licensing; if nothing else, Mill and Hammer may have gained the benefit of my editing and that of one other IP user without crediting Wikipedia. Cnilep (talk) 16:22, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
this may be, but it is perfectly legal. if the same person wrote the material, he has given us an non-exclusive, not an exclusive license, and is at perfect liberty to publsh it subsequently anywhere else he pleases. If he is using material contributed by other editors also, he is violating their copyright, not that of Wikipedia, and should give the necessary credit; of he has made use of material contributed by Cnilep without acknowledgment, Cnielp has a justiified complaint against him. . But the material present here would not be be a copyright Violation, whatever may be the status of it elsewhere. There is no basis for deleting it a copyvio, and I have restored the material and removed the copyvio tag. DGG ( talk ) 07:00, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Have you ascertained that the material was in fact copied from Wikipedia to Mill and Hammer, and not vice versa? That seems a likely possibility, but I'm not certain of the fact. I cannot find a date on the Mill and Hammer web page in question. Cnilep (talk) 15:48, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Green tickY I can't either, but given that you searched and did not find it in March, I suspect that your instinct that this may be a case of reverse infringement would be right. Of course, as DGG notes, it's only reverse infringement if Jonathan Gorgas is not Jonnygorgo or if you or the IP added substantial creative content that has been copied without credit. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:02, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Copyright_problems/2010_April_20&oldid=1044791867"