[go: nahoru, domu]

Jump to content

Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2010 December 13

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

13 December 2010[edit]

Reviewed

SCV for 2010-12-13 Edit

2010-12-13 (Suspected copyright violations)[edit]
  • No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. Attributed intrawiki copying. VernoWhitney (talk) 17:23, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Cut and paste move fixed by investigator or others. VernoWhitney (talk) 17:23, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • No copyright concern. False positive. DuncanHill (talk) 15:03, 13 December 2010 (UTC) and[reply]
  • No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. DuncanHill (talk) 15:03, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. VernoWhitney (talk) 17:23, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)[edit]
OK, I'll fix it. Rms125a@hotmail.com (talk) 19:33, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:25, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Great report, as always. :) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:28, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • User was not notified, relisting under today's entry. (Source located.) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:45, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. I think from the talk page that it is a single sentence in dispute. I've rewritten it just to be on the safe side, though it certainly would have been de minimis. Nevertheless, it was part of expanding the lede so a net positive. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:54, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • No source found; copy-paste tag removed and cv-unsure tag placed at article talk. But BLP Prodded. It needs some sourcing. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:35, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • This one comes due for closure at AfD in a few hours. It's likely to be deleted. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:38, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • This one needs some close review. Cf. [1], p. 3: "A Converged Infrastructure orchestrates the business request with the applications, data, and infrastructure. It defines the policies and service levels through automated workflows, provisioning, and change management design by IT and the business. Orchestration provides an application-aligned infrastructure that can be scaled up or down based on the needs of each application. Orchestration also provides centralized management of the resource pool, including billing, metering, and chargeback for consumption." This is duplicated in the article except for a few words eliminated from the send of the second sentence. I do not yet know if there is copyvio in the rest, but this is blatant. I've got to run out for a bit but am noting this here either for future me or for somebody else. :) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:07, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. I've removed all I found, anyway. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:12, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]