Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2017 August 20

The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it.

Article deleted by Buckshot06 under G12 allegedly as a result of Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/20130819 4. But the subject is notable. Request that the article be restored, with its infobox and categories, but without the copyvio material. Hawkeye7 (talk) 00:48, 20 August 2017 (UTC) Hawkeye7 (talk)[reply]

Non-copyrightable parts pasted to User:Hawkeye7/RAF Shepherds Grove. I haven't looked into whether the original deletion was valid. —Cryptic 01:34, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. I couldn't do that myself, because I'm not an admin. I cannot comment on the deletion either, for the same reason. But I would be happy for the article to be re-created with those parts only. Hawkeye7 (talk) 01:54, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thankyou Cryptic, yes sorry the subject is clearly notable. But only with all the hardcopy books that Bwmoll3 had is it possible to determine how much of the text was a copyvio (see the top of his talk page). Happy to restore the skeleton for any user with/without a deletion review. Apologies for any inconvenience. Buckshot06 (talk) 06:19, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The skeleton is just fine. Thank you. Hawkeye7 (talk) 10:59, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it.