Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 June 6

< June 5	June 7 >

June 6

Skagen logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:02, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Skagen logo.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by 718 Bot (notify | contribs).

Obsolete; replaced with File:Skagen logo.svg The New Mikemoral ♪♫ 00:17, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy deletion once a non-free raster is vectored (and orphaned), it must be deleted immediately. Zoo Fari 03:06, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

NPVMapKey2.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons, please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:NPVMapKey2.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Szu (notify | contribs).

No longer used, replaced with editable text. » Swpb^{τ • ¢} 00:34, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

MichaelCarbonaro.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:MichaelCarbonaro.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Allstarecho (notify | contribs).

Redundant non-free image. The image is already part of the movie poster at the top of the article and having this extra goes against WP:NFCC#3a Peripitus (Talk) 02:09, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

SmallTownGayBarTrailerCap.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:SmallTownGayBarTrailerCap.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Allstarecho (notify | contribs).

Decorative use only non-free image. Fails WP:NFCC#8. There is no discussion about the image at all - Peripitus (Talk) 02:41, 6 June 2009 (UTC) Peripitus (Talk) 02:41, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 07:09, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

BaileyJuniorHighJackson.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:BaileyJuniorHighJackson.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Allstarecho (notify | contribs).

Replaceable fair use. The building is still there from what I can see so creating a free image is possible now - fails WP:NFCC#1 Peripitus (Talk) 02:42, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

PearlMSBecomesACity.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:PearlMSBecomesACity.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Allstarecho (notify | contribs).

Newspaper basically used to illustrate just the headline. Decorative use only and fails WP:NFCC#8 as it does not significantly increase reader's understanding Peripitus (Talk) 03:05, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Image does not have Fair use Rationale and does not significantly increase reader's understanding (WP:NFCC#8). -FASTILY ^(TALK) 07:09, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Jodhi may.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jodhi may.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Nosebutton (notify | contribs).

Possible Copyright violation - Image is found on internet, for example at [1] and [2]. There's no indication that the image is free, as claimed on image page. -Duribald (talk) 03:39, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Unlicensed, probably non-free image of living person. American Eagle (talk) 04:44, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and American Eagle. A free image should be used instead. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 07:06, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Stevie Nicks in Rooms On Fire.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stevie Nicks in Rooms On Fire.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Roodngis (notify | contribs).

Image fails WP:NFCC#8 as the image does not add significantly to readers' understanding of the article and its omission would not be detrimental to that understanding — Σ xplicit 05:44, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The image is used to illustrate the subject in question. Where no cover art's equivalent is available or could be created that would adequately give the same information. Legitimate, minimal usage. --Roodngis (talk) 08:01, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The image is nothing more than a non-free image of the artist, and it adds nothing to readers' understanding of the article. Stifle (talk) 15:31, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Untitled-2.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete, and protected placeholder image uploaded to prevent further uploads at this name. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 01:20, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Untitled-2.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by ArthurStirling (notify | contribs).

Originally a cover of The Journal of Arthur Stirling; overwritten several times due to a generic filename. Currently a screenshot of a non-notable website; I have now re-uploaded the original picture as File:The Journal of Arthur Stirling.jpg. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 06:51, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment shouldn't this filename be disallowed because of its genericity, and tendency to get overwritten? 70.29.210.130 (talk) 04:21, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Dustinwilliamsbio.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dustinwilliamsbio.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dustinlw1987 (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, no encyclopedic value. JaGa^talk 08:51, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Low quality, unencyclopedic, orphaned, use not stated. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 06:56, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Dwntownlv.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dwntownlv.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Meridethmyers (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, little encyclopedic value. JaGa^talk 08:53, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Low quality, unencyclopedic, orphaned, use not stated. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 06:57, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

French Belgium.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:French Belgium.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Tavernsenses (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, low quality, copyright in image JaGa^talk 08:55, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Low quality, unencyclopedic, orphaned, use not stated. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 06:57, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Dutch Belgium.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dutch Belgium.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Tavernsenses (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, low quality, copyright in image JaGa^talk 08:55, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Low quality, unencyclopedic, orphaned, use not stated. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 06:57, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

VanceHartke.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Not deleted, but replaced with {{npd}}. When an OTRS ticket is lodged, that should be replaced. – Quadell ^(talk) 15:48, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:VanceHartke.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by RickK (notify | contribs).

Source website does not specify the original image src, and states that "Not all images are in the public domain" on its copyright page. Papa November (talk) 09:59, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I've just lodged an inquiry with the Senate Photo Historian. Please give me some time to get a reply. -Rrius (talk) 19:30, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- My inquiry received the following reply:

Hello.

Yes, as far as we can determine, that image is in the public domain and may be used.

Heather Moore

Photo Historian

U.S. Senate Historical Office

-Rrius (talk) 19:29, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I would note that by the time Hartke was in office it seems official portraits of senators were taken as a matter of course, and this image has that look about it. -Rrius (talk) 19:29, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Great work, thanks a lot! Please could you forward the reply to OTRS, making it clear that you're talking about this image. That should fix the issue perfectly well. Papa November (talk) 21:20, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Jimmy2004.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jimmy2004.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Doubleback (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, no encyclopedic value. JaGa^talk 10:06, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Low quality, unencyclopedic, orphaned, use not stated. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 06:58, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Curlew06.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Curlew06.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jimfbleak (notify | contribs).

Cropped thumbnail of higher-res img @ Commons with same name Papa November (talk) 10:25, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete per Speedy Deletion criteria WP:CSD#F8. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 06:59, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Chipmunk Aircraft WB569.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chipmunk Aircraft WB569.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mikecrush (notify | contribs).

Image:Chipmunk Aircraft WK642.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs)

Image:Chipmunk Aircraft WK554.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs)

Image:Chipmunk Aircraft WZ845.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs)

Image:Chipmunk Aircraft WP855.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs)

Image:Chipmunk Aircraft WK518.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs)

Image:Chipmunk Aircraft WG430.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs)

Image:Chipmunk Aircraft WB627.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs)

Image:Chipmunk Aircraft WP860.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs)

All these images, uploaded by Mikecrush, are being used in a fair use image gallery in violation of WP:NFCC#3a. Additionally, they are not the subject of critical commentary in the article, failing WP:NFCC#8. Stifle (talk) 15:28, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

--Mikecrush (talk) 18:57, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Stifle...

Thank you for your help and guidance. I fully understand and appreciate your point. I know the copyright holders for some of the images where I will endeavour to help them upload their images for free use/distribution on Wikipedia. I was just trying to help as some of this is a bit daunting !

I will delete the images now from my article but retain the gallary frame code for later use if I may.

Please see my other note regarding the No. 1 AEF Unit Badge where I have declared a revised tag.

Kind regards...

Mike.

Delete All per nom. Images fail several WP:NFCC criteria. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 07:03, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Nathan Kress.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nathan Kress.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Andyman100 (notify | contribs).

Possible copyvio. Uploader claims they are the author of the work, however this professional image of a celebrity can be found on various websites ([3] and [4] and more). Nick—^Contact/_Contribs 19:37, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Head graphic sm.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Papa November (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:06, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Head graphic sm.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Frei Hans (notify | contribs).

obselete orphan image replaced by File:Unwired_head.jpg on the same day by myself, the uploader. Frei Hans (talk) 21:15, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.