Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 April 17

< April 16	April 18 >

April 17

File:MuppetShw.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decorative non-free photo showing two men working with puppets. It's being used to decorate the articles about these men. No information on the photo is relevant to the understanding of the article. Damiens.rf 01:38, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jimhensonhour.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free publicity photo used to decorate an article about a tv show and a biography. Damiens.rf 01:40, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:KermitInchworm.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Beautiful non-free decorative film still. Damiens.rf 01:40, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Krishna as avatar.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not used. Not useful. Damiens.rf 02:10, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Agreed as the uploader. It's not being used anymore. Regards, Cinosaur (talk) 17:25, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Avatar Felling of HomeTree.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by King of Hearts (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:19, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decorative movie still being used to decorate a the text where the passage on the movie is mentioned. Damiens.rf 02:12, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Strong keep: The image is used under FUR to illustrate a crucial thematic connection between the Avatar movie and 9/11 in Themes in Avatar, as reported by WP:RS. Regards, Cinosaur (talk) 17:18, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete what of significance do I gain by seeing this image in its context ? I've read the section and, while the image is nice, it leaves me with little more that the text. Image fails WP:NFCC#8 - Peripitus (Talk) 23:09, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Avatarbulldozer2.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by King of Hearts (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:19, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decorative movie still being used to decorate a the text where the passage on the movie is mentioned. Damiens.rf 02:12, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Strong keep: The image is used under FUR to illustrate a crucial thematic connection between the Avatar film and environmental issues in Themes in Avatar, as reported by WP:RS. Regards, Cinosaur (talk) 17:18, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I do not need to see a poor image of part of a bulldozer to fully comprehend this scene. It adds little to nothing beyond illustration to reader's understanding and fails WP:NFCC#8. - Peripitus (Talk) 23:07, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Avatarwar.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decorative movie still being used to decorate a the text where the passage on the movie is mentioned. Damiens.rf 02:12, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Strong keep: The image is used under FUR to illustrate a crucial thematic connection between the Avatar film and militarism in Themes in Avatar, as reported by WP:RS. Regards, Cinosaur (talk) 17:18, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Image not needed to visualize. Too many screenshots are used. Why not use an actual Vietnam photo in the public domain? serioushat 09:08, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:JenniferSebnemSchaefer1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sure not clear on what the license for this image should be - the history says cc-by, which is disputed by someone. And this probably isn't applicable for fair use, per WP:NFCC#1 and WP:NFCC#2 (press photo, speedy deleteable per WP:CSD#F7). Bringing to FFD rather than PUF or CSD per complicated case. Magog the Ogre (talk) 02:13, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It was a bit of mess when I saw it (and the next one). It claimed cc-by, and had no permission as the source was http://www.angelfire.com/folk/stinkt/VIERTELFINALE_DREI480.jpg. It also had a detailed FUR. It obviously cannot be FUR and in All Free Media at the same time. Rather than just tag for di-no-permission, considering someone had taken the time to list a FUR, I plumped to (try to) sort it out according to the FUR given - and placed that data into a FUR template, and then reduced the images down to a reasonable Fair Use size. I see the OP has moved the deletion notices from his talk page - he does seem to have gained a few issues in the past - User:Cretanforever/Image_copyright_issues. Maybe deletion is the best way forward, unless the OP decides to get some permission... Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:16, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:JenniferSebnemSchaefer2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

see above. Magog the Ogre (talk) 02:13, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Avatarvirtualcamera.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free image being used to decorate the text discussing motion capture on Avatar. Nothing on this specific image seems crucial for the understanding of the text. Damiens.rf 02:17, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Avatarmotioncapture.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free image being used to decorate the text discussing motion capture on Avatar. Nothing on this specific image seems crucial for the understanding of the text. Damiens.rf 02:17, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DrNegative.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not used. Not useful. Wikipedia is not a webhost. Damiens.rf 02:19, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I was the original up-loader of this file and agree with the deletion request. DrNegative (talk) 20:18, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Plague of death.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Random movie still being used to decorate plot text. The scene may be important in the movie, but it doesn't follow we need to show it to encyclopedically describe the movie plot. Damiens.rf 02:22, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Prince of egypt.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decorative non-free image of an artist working. Damiens.rf 02:23, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Verizon-Rule-the-Air.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F4 by 5 albert square (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free non-original upload .jpg, redirected for PNG file. J Komara (talk) 20:31, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Josh And Rianon 2.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

UE - WP:NOTHOST Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:40, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Josh And Rianon 4.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

UE - WP:NOTHOST Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:42, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Josh And Rianon 5.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

UE - WP:NOTHOST Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:42, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Josh And Rianon 6.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

UE - WP:NOTHOST Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:42, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Josh And Rianon.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

UE - WP:NOTHOST Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:43, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Josh and Rianon3.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

UE - WP:NOTHOST Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:43, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Julie-Harris-52.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. Though the rationale is compelling, all the links on the description page, including the source, are stale. Without a valid source, public domain cannot be asserted at this time. If a verifiable source is found, ping me for undeleting (or upload to Commons). — Edokter (talk) — 14:43, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License claims "public domain because it was published in the United States between 1923 and 1963" - however date in information panel is 1977. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 23:26, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License revised. --Wikiwatcher1 (talk) 23:56, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why should we take the current information as accurate? --Damiens.rf 04:21, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I would have used this version, but the quality was not as good.--Wikiwatcher1 (talk) 05:24, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Foad-2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, subject no identified Skier Dude (talk) 23:57, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.