Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Nimrauko

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Nimrauko

Final (0/5/0); ended 16:37, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Closed as per WP:SNOW. Much more experience required in all spaces before an admin position can be considered for this candidate. (aeropagitica) 15:38, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Nimrauko (talk · contribs) -

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:I accept this nomination

NOTE: The candidate blanked this RfA with a comment suggesting that they were trying to withdraw. Could someone close this request? --ais523 15:19, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. You may wish to answer the following optional questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. What admin work do you intend to take part in?

A: I intend to help keep vandalism out of Established Articles and their Talk Pages. I intend to keep pages Unbiased (Neutral).

2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?

A:I do not create articles, but I do help take out vandalism from the talk pages and articles.

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

A: I have had some conflicts, but I try to keep a level head. The way I do this is by seeing where the other person is coming from. I talk to the person using non agressive language and generally see their complaints and work with them to remedy the problem.

General comments

• See Nimrauko's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool. For the edit count, see the talk page.
• Links for Nimrauko: Nimrauko (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)

---

Please keep criticism constructive and polite. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/Nimrauko before commenting.

Discussion

Support

Oppose

1. You don't have nearly enough edits for me to gauge whether you'd make a good administrator or not. With only 36 edits, it would seem likely that you don't have enough experience to avoid mistakes in using admin tools. Your nomination statement and answers to the questions are also quite short and don't make it clear why giving you admin powers would be a good idea. There's plenty of administrative things you can do without admin powers. Sorry for this time, with any luck, you'll be able to pass in a few months if you spend the time making constructive edits and demonstrating your knowledge of policy. --ais523 13:33, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
2. Oppose per the total of seven edits in the mainspace and 36 edits total. Suggest a 'crat remove this thing before the pile-ons come on in. Sorry Nimrauko, but we just don't have enough material from you to make a judgement about your capabilities as an admin. Cheers, Lanky ○ Yell ○ 13:46, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
3. Oppose. Not enough experiance. --Mschel 13:49, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
4. Oppose - didn't even read/follow the instructions for how to post this RfA (as I post this, the editor still hasn't "accepted", which is clearly supposed to be done before transcluding). If Nimrauko can't handle this task, how am I supposed to have confidence that he/she will handle the other admin tasks? Akradecki 13:52, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
5. Oppose, user is not ready for this I'm afraid. Punkmorten 14:01, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Neutral

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.