[go: nahoru, domu]
Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SheryOfficial

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

SheryOfficial

SheryOfficial (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected
This SPI case may involve cross-wiki abuse. Please consider reporting the results on Meta; checkusers can send an email to the interwiki checkuser mailing list if required.


08 June 2024[edit]

– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

Page moves, subject area, some beans which make me 100% sure it's them (e-mail me to discuss these if needed). Thanks, ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 14:42, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Primefac: behaviorally the account LolingTom also clearly is SheryOfficial, per the usual page moves, subject areas and beans I'm willing to discuss via e-mail with any admin or clerk. ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 17:20, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
  • LolingTom's global lock is as a sock of Xpërt100, which is tagged here on enwiki as a confirmed sock of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dr Sachin Kapur Fanclub. So some sort of merging seems to be needed. (Edit: Apaugasma's reply is sensible.) SilverLocust 💬 07:26, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I could be mistaken, but I don't think that Xpërt100 is SheryOfficial. I'm more inclined to think that the identification of LolingTom as Xpërt100 on Simple English Wikipedia is wrong. In any case I don't think it's a good idea to go for a merge without some more digging. Whether it's actually worth digging into, I'm not sure. The only thing that I can say I'm 100% of is that LolingTom is SheryOfficial. ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 14:30, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

  • I ran a check, and oddly enough they are  Confirmed to globally-locked LolingTom but I'm not seeing any direct connection to this master. Primefac (talk) 16:12, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • There seems to be considerable overlap between these two investigations, but in the end it doesn't really matter. Closing. – bradv 18:50, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

15 June 2024[edit]

– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

All the usual: focus on page moves, subject areas, and beans I'm willing to discuss with any clerk or admin via e-mail. I'm 100% certain it's them. Thanks, ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 19:58, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Yup, this is SheryOfficial, eg [1] [2]. Please rollback all their edits. --HistoryofIran (talk) 20:07, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

They just admitted to socking [3]. HistoryofIran (talk) 21:22, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

  • Also confirmed to User:LolingTom! And to User:Sharekizek. Primefac, I'm not sure how to tag these and I'm wondering if perhaps you can have a look to see if the four ranges (three are already blocked) are candidates for a hard block, esp. considering that last comment of theirs, linked above. Drmies (talk) 22:34, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    In my opinion they've hit the LTA status of not bothering to tag them, but I do agree a rangeblock is likely on the cards here. Primefac (talk) 15:34, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Closing. A range-block may be necessary, but I'm not seeing an obvious one to make at the moment. – bradv 18:51, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

20 June 2024[edit]

– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

Another new user (created 19 hours after ProudRafidi's block) at WP:RM/TR who is requesting the restoration of a reverted move by blocked sock CanadianFolks (and is already familiar with reverting sockpuppetry after having this account for 3 days). Same subject interests. SilverLocust 💬 00:42, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Found the smoking gun, reverted Apaugasma to restore the edit of a sock of SheryOfficial [4] [5], please rollback all their edits. EDIT: Here's another one [6] [7]. --HistoryofIran (talk) 15:51, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

  • Closing. I have blocked Shqiptër4, although it's not obvious whether the account belongs to SheryOfficial or Xpërt100. (They are also confirmed to User:LolingTom, fwiw). – bradv 18:53, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/SheryOfficial&oldid=1230618131"