[go: nahoru, domu]

Jump to content

Talk:Acts 2 Network

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Why criticism of the church should stay in the article

[edit]

206.71.234.163 reverted the article back to this version, stating the WP:ONUS on keeping information in was on those trying to include information, hence this discussion. In short, the sentence noting controversies should stay (and, if anything, be fleshed out into a paragraph as seen here because controversies makeup a significant part of the coverage of this organization in reliable sources, which we should follow per WP:WEIGHT. That sentence included citations to Christianity Today, The UC San Diego Triton, and Wired, or three of the four citations in the article at that time. Mach61 13:16, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:ATTACKPAGE 166.198.21.106 (talk) 19:11, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please explain to me how the current state of this article exists primarily to disparage or threaten its subject, which is what an attack page is. It contains one sentence, which is sourced, that mentions anything negative about the organization. Mach61 23:00, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]